<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419</id><updated>2011-04-21T15:59:12.719-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Wisconsin Sports</title><subtitle type='html'></subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>16</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113201972455650193</id><published>2005-11-14T17:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-14T17:55:24.566-08:00</updated><title type='text'>NFL Quick Hits</title><content type='html'>Green Bay's victory over Atlanta yesterday was a much needed win.  They should get credit for going out and executing on the road.  Atlanta, on the other hand, should be ashamed of themselves for losing this one.  It is safe to say that they were outcoached in that game, and that gave the Packers a distinct advantage.  Anyone watching Green Bay the last few weeks has seen that if you double Driver, their passing game is almost non-existent, yet he was running free on single coverage all day.  Atlanta's secondary is not good, so it is on the coaching staff that they had the single coverage on him.  Secondly, Atlanta did not appear motivated to play hard.  Vick seemed like he wanted to prove to everyone he can be a pocket passer.  Problem is, he can't.  He should just stick to what he does best and help his team win any way he can.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't be fooled by Joey Harrington's big game against Arizona yesterday.  First, it was against Arizona.  Second, it was at home.  Third, every quarterback in the NFL is capable of having one or two big games each season, and this was Harrington's.  Expect him to throw at least two interceptions next week against Dallas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pittsburgh continues to roll without Big Ben.  I know the Colts are undefeated and will have the home field advantage in the playoffs, but I'm beginning to think that the Steelers are the best team in the league.  If they are entirely healthy, they can flat out dominate the line of scrimmage against anybody.  Indy's defense is about speed, and I think the Steelers can just pound them all day and beat them.  It reminds me of the late 1990's Wisconsin Badgers teams with Ron Dayne.  They weren't very quick, but thier offensive line was always three yards down field before Dayne met them, and they just beat teams up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Minnesota's victory over the Giants may have been the strangest victory I have seen.  They had no drives longer than 5 plays until their field goal drive in the fourth quarter, yet the score was tied 21-21.  Most times, if you win two out of the three facets of a game, you will win (offense, defense, and special teams).  Yesterday, they arguably only won the special teams battle, yet they so dominated in that aspect that 150 yards of total offesne is all they needed to pull out a victory.  If they Giants want to be a Super Bowl threat, they must win games like that.  I wonder if this could be like their home loss to Chicago last year that wiped out a promising start and led to their subsequent poor finish.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking of Chicago, I think the highlight of the year came from that game.  No, not the 108 yard missed field goal return, but rather Chicago's missed field goal in the first quarter.  I've never seen a football go that far right on a field goal attempt in my life.  It was comical, and borderline hysterical, watching that football get pushed right.  I wish I had Tivo to save that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New England gutted out a win versus Miami.  The Colts and Steelers are better teams (the Chargers and Broncos are better than them as well) but I will not count this team out until they are officially done.  Any team with Brady at quarterback will be a threat to win, regardless of how many people are out for them.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113201972455650193?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113201972455650193/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113201972455650193' title='17 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113201972455650193'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113201972455650193'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/nfl-quick-hits.html' title='NFL Quick Hits'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>17</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113181430208807002</id><published>2005-11-12T08:44:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-12T08:51:42.090-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Trade Jenkins?</title><content type='html'>I heard on the radio this morning a rumor that the Brewers are exploring a Geoff Jenkins trade. Doug Melvin has denied any rumors, however it wouldn't surprise me if this were being discussed behind the scenes. After a horrible start, Jenkins had a fabulous second half of the season and his trade value right now is pretty good. On top of that, he doesn't really make that much money compared to others at his position. I'm not sure where he would go, however. The Cubs need a right fielder, however I can't see the Brewers trading Jenkins in the division. While this trade might be explored, I really can't see it happening. The Brewers aren't going to want to let go of a veteran for prospects. Their time is now, and they can't afford to lose veteran leadership and try to spend another 3 years developing prospects. They need the leadership in the locker room to help the young players they already have.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113181430208807002?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113181430208807002/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113181430208807002' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113181430208807002'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113181430208807002'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/trade-jenkins_12.html' title='Trade Jenkins?'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113181382073967403</id><published>2005-11-12T08:29:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-12T08:43:40.760-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Weekend Picks</title><content type='html'>My top play for this weekend is Oklahoma -13 over Texas A&amp;M.  Oklahoma is coming off a bye and is rested, with Adrian Peterson at full strength.  That will be a problems for A&amp;M, as their defense averages giving up 140 rushing yards per game on the road.  On top of that, Oklahoma averages about 190 rushing yards per game at home.  A&amp;M's defense is giving up almost 500 yards on the road, and they haven't even played Texas yet, and they are coming off a 56-17 loss at Texas Tech.  The last three matchups between these teams at Oklahoma have been 77-0, 31-10, and 51-6, all in Oklahoma's favor.  Lay the 13 points at home for Oklahoma.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My other play for the weekend is BYU -4.5 over Wyoming.  BYU is 4-1 in their last 5 games, and the loss was at Notre Dame.  They are also off back to back wins where they have scored at least 55 points in each game.  Wyoming, on the other hand, is on a four game losing streak and have given up 39 and 43 in their last two.  BYU is rolling, and should be able to cover in this game on the road.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113181382073967403?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113181382073967403/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113181382073967403' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113181382073967403'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113181382073967403'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/weekend-picks_12.html' title='Weekend Picks'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113141046639856079</id><published>2005-11-07T16:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-07T16:41:06.410-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Brewers extend Melvin</title><content type='html'>This weekend, the Milwaukee Brewers extended Doug Melvin's contract through 2009. This is a great move for the franchise. Melvin has made some good moves since he's been in Milwaukee, and he deserves the opportunity to be with the franchise to see if the players he has acquired get this team to the playoffs. With a limited budget, he was able to put together a winning team full of young talent that has the potential to develop into a playoff contender. With this extension, he'll be able to continue building this team and then sign the free agents necessary to establish depth to round out the core of this team. The nucleus is there and began to show good things in the second half of the season. If he can get better depth on the bench and add an arm in the rotation, this team will improve on its 2005 season. Lets just pray that he doesn't get "comfortable;" he maintain his drive to make this team a contender.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113141046639856079?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113141046639856079/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113141046639856079' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113141046639856079'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113141046639856079'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/brewers-extend-melvin.html' title='Brewers extend Melvin'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113140658235578991</id><published>2005-11-07T15:05:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-07T15:37:16.103-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Quick NFL thoughts</title><content type='html'>It was nice to see Michael Vick have a good game in the pocket. He can still make plays with his feet, but he is eventually going to have to be an accurate passer for Atlanta to compete for a Super Bowl. He has a great winning percentage, and this blog rates a QB's winning percentage above all other statistics (which is why we would take Brady over Manning without thinking twice), but he is not yet accurate enough to win the Super Bowl. Hopefully this is a step in the right direction, however after 5 years, you would think by this point he either has it or he doesn't.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brad Johnson filled in well for the injured Daunte Culpepper. He didn't make any mistakes and only threw one questionable ball, which didn't matter because it was a free play. If he can have this type of efficiency, Minnesota might not be done in the NFC North.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Joey Harrington is awful; I won't be surprised if he is out of the league when his contract is up. Look for Detroit to possibly trade one of their receivers and a draft pick to San Diego for Phillip Rivers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;San Diego needs to be better in the fourth quarter to go anywhere in the playoffs. Going back to the game against the Jets in last years playoffs, they have led in the fourth quarter in every game, yet their record is 5-5. Marty needs to grow some kiwis and hammer the ball at people. You wonder if his tentative coaching goes back to Earnest Byner's fumble in the 1987 AFC championship game against the Broncos when he was at Cleveland.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Favre has taken alot of heat for the fumble yesterday, but they never should have been in that position. The two false starts were inexcusable. Penalties and turnovers have been killing GB this year, and some of the blame for that must fall on the coaches. Penalties are a result of a lack of mental toughness and preparation. The only team that the Packers had an edge on in this department was NO. The turnovers are a lack of focus (especially Favre's interception). How many times does one player have to commit a penalty or turnover before the coaches will insert someone else? At least they took out Rashard Lee after his fumble, but many players continue to show a lack of focus during the games, and that is what separates teams when the score is close like it was yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Eli Manning got his first road win yesterday. Granted, it was against the 49ers, but now he is over that mental hurdle. I've posted before that I think Eli will be a star in this league, and yesterday was another step in his career progression.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Will the Seahawks finally give Shawn Alexander a contract extension? The knock on him is that he doesn't get the tough yards when they need them (I'll have post about that topic another day). I'll buy that argument, however he consistently piles up yards and touchdowns. He's good in the locker room and fits well in Seattle's community. He shouldn't be the highest paid RB, but he definitely should be resigned long term. I think a 7-10 million dollar bonus on a 4-5 year deal is adequate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For Wisconsin fans, Brooks Bollinger played well in relief yesterday with the Jets. He'll never be a number 1 quarterback, but he is proving to be a solid backup and could have a long career in the league in that capacity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For those who watch Monday Morning Quarterback on ESPN, do you ever notice how Ditka can't finish a sentence without starting the next one? He is always ending a sentence a word or two short. I like his analyses, but I often find myself not paying attention to what he's saying because I'm so focused on counting how many times he cuts himself off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lavar Arrington played well for the Redskins last night. The coaching staff there has to keep him on the field for them to have playoff hopes. If not, I think they'll fall short.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113140658235578991?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113140658235578991/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113140658235578991' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113140658235578991'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113140658235578991'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/quick-nfl-thoughts.html' title='Quick NFL thoughts'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113140471109900384</id><published>2005-11-07T14:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-07T16:43:05.633-08:00</updated><title type='text'>The Packers should not go after TO</title><content type='html'>I was listened to AM 1250 on the way to work this morning and they were arguing that the Packers should pick up TO. If they are smart, they will stay as far away from him as possible. TO is all about TO. If Favre has a bad game, TO will be on the sideline fuming, and after the game will go on about how they would have won if Brady was their quarterback. On the field, if Favre throws for 300 yards but TO only has 1 catch for 10 yards, he will be in Favre's ear. TO is more concerned about his stats than winning. If you caught his press conference after the Super Bowl, you would have noticed that not once did he mention any anger at not winning the game. He used it as a platform to proclaim that he performed a miracle by coming back from his broken leg and playing well, and then threw fire at McNabb by inferring that the reason they lost was that McNabb was tired at the end of the game. Everything there was said to make himself look good and to blame everyone else for the loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chemistry matters in football. With TO, you lose that chemistry. When was the last time you saw a Super Bowl team win when there was dissention in the locker room? The entire New England team is together, and it's no coincidence that they have won 3 of the last 4 Super Bowls (as a sidebar, I think one of the worst proclamations by an analyst was when Tom Jackson on ESPN declared that the entire Patriots locker room was against Belichick after he got rid of Lawyer Malloy and they had the opening loss to Buffalo in 2003. They finished 14-2 and won the Super Bowl against the Panthers). When Green Bay won in 1997, the two leaders of the team were Favre and Reggie White, and they were on the same page with Holmgren to lead them to victory. Even when the Ravens won, they trusted Dilfer not to screw up, and he didn't. He played within the system and let the defense dominate other teams. Sure, there are going to be people on a team that don't like each other; however when Sunday comes around, the championship teams function as one unit, with each player trusting the others to make plays they should make. That cannot happen with TO on your team. You know each time McNabb exits a huddle, in the back of his mind he is wondering what the reaction will be if he misses TO on an open route. The same is said if the team decides to run all day and abandon a passing game. The teams will all have to worry about TO. If you paid attention, the two playoff games that Philly won last year without TO were the ultimate team performances, with both sides of the ball dominating. I think Philly made the right move today by suspending TO for the season, and if the Packers are smart, they will stay as far away from TO as possible. Let the Vikings sign him; they seem to be OK with negative publicity directed their way.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113140471109900384?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113140471109900384/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113140471109900384' title='3 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113140471109900384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113140471109900384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/packers-should-not-go-after-to.html' title='The Packers should not go after TO'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>3</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113120580902126620</id><published>2005-11-05T07:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-05T07:50:09.073-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Weekend Picks</title><content type='html'>I'll give my college picks here at this time.  My first bet was a 6 point teaser with Central Michigan, Notre Dame, and Missouri.  I don't know too much about Central Michigan, however a popular gaming publication has gone 9-0 this year in their weekly top play and Central Michigan is their top play this week.  That was enough for me to tease that one.  I think the Notre Dame game will be closer than people think, but with the teaser I was able to get it down to 3 points.  Straight up, I would expect Tennessee to keep this one closer than the 9 point spread.  ONe concern I have is that the road team has WON the last 4 meetings between these teams.  Missouri was getting 11.5 against Colorado, so with the teaser I was able to get 17.5.  I like the hook there; 17 is a popular number in football and that half point may come in handy.  Missouri is a better team than people realize and should be able to keep in Colorado's reach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also played two straight up games this weekend.  I played Central Michigan, for the reasons stated above.  I also played Nevada over Hawaii.  One trend that led me to this pick is that Hawaii hasn't covered their last road game of the season in the past 5 years.  This one opened at 6.5, but I was able to get Nevada -5.  These seem to be the money makers this week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other picks that I considered but didn't pull the trigger on are Michigan State -4 against Purdue and Wisconisn +12 against Penn State.  The only reason I didn't play the Wisconsin game is I have a rule to not bet for or against the Badgers.  As for Michigan State, this might be a good play.  Purdue has yet to cover a spread this year (0-7-1) and are in turmoil.  The chemistry on that team is awful and Joe Tiller might be on his way out the door at seasons end.  Michigan State has an explosive passing game and Purdue's pass defense is not good.  Michigan State should be able to cover the 4, however I don't trust them enough on the road, so I layed off that one.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113120580902126620?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113120580902126620/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113120580902126620' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113120580902126620'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113120580902126620'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/weekend-picks.html' title='Weekend Picks'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113097255339408517</id><published>2005-11-02T14:59:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-11-02T15:02:33.403-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Bucks Opener</title><content type='html'>Anyone who saw the Bucks open last night in Philly saw that this has the potential to be a very exciting team.  TJ Ford is unbelievable, and if he stays healthy there is no way the Bucks won't make the playoffs.  He singlehandedly changes the flow of the game; I can't picture anyone in the NBA who is quicker with the ball than he is (including AI).  Bobby Simmons fit in well with the team, as did Magloire.  It was nice to see Bogut get minutes as well.  He finished with 37 minutes and put up 13 and 9, and he only had 1 foul.  This team will compete in the East this year, and while they may not be there quite yet, this team could get home court advantage for one round of the playoffs.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113097255339408517?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113097255339408517/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113097255339408517' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113097255339408517'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113097255339408517'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/11/bucks-opener.html' title='Bucks Opener'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113080076670046919</id><published>2005-10-31T15:05:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-10-31T15:19:26.713-08:00</updated><title type='text'>NFL bits and pieces</title><content type='html'>I heard alot of radio hosts today say that despite his 5 interceptions, Favre kept his team in it. That can't be further from the truth. There are two reasons they were in that game: (1) the defense played another good game and almost bailed out the offense, and (2) Cincinnati didn't really look like they expected GB to win, and turned it on only when they needed to. The only reason GB was in a position to score in the first place was that the refs made a horrible pass interference call on the Bengals to give them about 50 yards of field position.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was not nearly as surprised at Tampa losing as most people were. Chris Sims is not a good quarterback and I would NEVER trust him in a big game (see Oklahoma). Tampa played an easy schedule for the first 6 weeks and their record reflects that. Look for them to come back to earth the next few weeks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Same goes for Washington. Has a team ever put up more than 50 points one week then get shutout the next? They had some miracle wins early, don't expect that to hold as the season progresses. On the other side of the ball, I'm really starting to believe in this Giant team. They have incredible talent at all of the skill positions, and their rookie corners really play the ball well. I think they'll win the East and possibly get a bye week in the first round of the playoffs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jacksonville needs to quit losing games they should win. No Bulger, Holt, or Bruce and they still can't pull out a win at St. Louis. This is becoming a theme for them-win a huge game and lose the next against an inferior team (they just beat Pittsburgh on the road and Cincy at home). They probably have the easiest schedule from here on out (two with Houston, one with Tennessee, Arizona, SF, and I think they still have Baltimore and Cleveland). If they can stay mentally focused, there is no way they can't win 10 games. I'm pretty sure Indy is the only team the face with a winning record the rest of the season.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gutty win by NE last night, but they still have too many holes to fill in their defense for them to three peat. That being said, I will never count out Brady until they finally lose. He's the best quarterback in the NFL right now, hands down (no, Manning isn't better). I'll write more on that another day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My players of the week have to be Steve Smith on offense and Tedy Bruschi on defense. Smith is a terror, and yesterday's 200 yard game against Minnesota showed that he is an elite receiver in this league, possibly the best in the game at the moment. Teams know Delhomme is going to him yet he still gets open and makes plays. I expect him to be all pro this year, barring injury. As for Bruschi, he didn't even have to make a play yesterday to get this award. This guy had a stroke less than 10 months ago and is back playing in the NFL. Unbelievable. I don't think anybody can put into words how incredible this comeback by him is. If you saw him shuffle out of the hospital in February, you had to be praying that he gets well enough so he can enjoy playing with his children, but NFL? No way, yet there was yesterday. He has a passion for the game that has very rarely been seen in our time and should be respected by any fan of the game.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113080076670046919?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113080076670046919/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113080076670046919' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113080076670046919'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113080076670046919'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/10/nfl-bits-and-pieces.html' title='NFL bits and pieces'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113062089328039289</id><published>2005-10-29T14:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-29T14:21:33.293-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Weekend Picks</title><content type='html'>I have a few picks for the NFL games tomorrow (I would post my college picks, but many of the games have already started).  All lines are current at the time of the posting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Carolina -7.5 against Minnesota.  Don't be fooled by Minnesota's come from behind win at home last week against GB.  This is a team that has trouble winning on the road, especially outdoors.  Carolina is coming off a bye week rested and confident after a road win.  I expect this game to be a double digit win for Carolina.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SD/KC over 51.  These are two of the best offenses in the NFL.  KC is playing their second road game in a row, however they have an extra 2 days rest after playing last Friday night.  Their offense is explosive and should be able to put up 24 points against SD.  San Diego is fuming after their loss to Philly last week and should be energized by the home crowd.  LT will run all over KC's defense.  Look for this to be a 38-24 win for the Chargers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As a rule, when I gamble on football, I generally only play one or two games per weekend.  I played one college game, and the SD/KC over will be my only game tomorrow.  The only way to make money in sports gambling is to gather as much information about the games as possible, then figure out which game provides the best money making opportunity.  Most winners will only play 1-2 games per week (the more you play, the sloppier you become and start to throw money back to the casino/websites).  That's probably the best tip you'll ever receive.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113062089328039289?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113062089328039289/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113062089328039289' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113062089328039289'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113062089328039289'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/10/weekend-picks.html' title='Weekend Picks'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113036648507111844</id><published>2005-10-26T15:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-26T15:41:25.080-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Looking back at my predictions</title><content type='html'>Looking back at my NFC predictions, a few things stick out. First, my thought on Minnesota and Green Bay were way off. Granted, GB has been decimated with injuries, but they are still playing way below expectations. Minnesota is just a train wreck and will need a miracle to get to 8 wins. I don't think either of those teams can rebound to win this division. I think Jeff Garcia will lead Detroit to 7 wins and the division title. If Rex Grossman can get back, Chicago might have a chance, otherwise they're done. I just don't trust a rookie quarterback, especially one that went to Purdue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I still think Philly will take the East, however the Giants are better than I thought-Eli is a stud and will be considered one of the best in the game by the end of the year. I think Dallas is going to falter and I expect Washington to do the same, however they could both get to 9 wins.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the Dirty South, I still think Carolina is the team to beat, and Atlanta is already 1-1 in their tough home games and should beat GB and Minn to go 3-1 in the 4 I circled. Tampa is the major surprise, however I expect them to fade later on (their wins aren't nearly as impressive as they looked at first-GB, Minn, Det, Buffalo, and Miami-not exactly world beaters). I don't think Sims will be as poised as Griese was. Say what you want about Griese, but he did give them a chance to win every game. I won't even comment on New Orleans, other than to say that they've gotten 20 years worth of bad breaks in the first 7 weeks of the season.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Out west, Seattle should win 10 games. Arizona can still rally to get to 7 or 8 wins unless the Nutty Professor puts Warner back in. SF won't win again. I don't know what to say about the Rams. They could easily win their remaining games, yet I can see them losing the rest as well. If you're a gambler, stay away (except for the overs on a 7 point teaser).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113036648507111844?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113036648507111844/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113036648507111844' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113036648507111844'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113036648507111844'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/10/looking-back-at-my-predictions.html' title='Looking back at my predictions'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113036166815190739</id><published>2005-10-26T14:13:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-26T14:21:08.156-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Bucks acquire Jamaal Magloire</title><content type='html'>The Bucks today traded Desmond Mason and a 2006 first round pick to the New Orleans (Oklahoma City) Hornets today for Jamaal Magloire. I love this trade for two reasons. First, the Bucks had a logjam at that position. They already have Michael Redd, Bobby Simmons, and Jiri Welsch, so one of the 4 had to go. Based on the contracts that Simmons and Redd just signed, Mason was the logical choice. He was a good presence in Milwaukee and was liked by fans both on and off the court, however most people familiar with the organization knew he was the odd man out and was going to get dealt eventually. Second, this trade solidifies the Milwaukee front court and gives it tremendous depth. Magloire is going to start, and the other starter will eventually be Bogut. This gives them two legitimate big men in the starting lineup, and bringing Joe Smith and Dan Gadzuric off the bench will add a spark to the lineup (I love Gadzuric off the bench-he's a high energy guy that can run up and down the floor for 4-5 minute stretches). With Kukoc, this gives the Bucks 5 guys 6'10'' or taller. I just thought of a third reason I like this pick-with the Bucks's horrible draft record the past 7-8 years (Redd notwithstanding) they're better off without a first round pick. We don't need another Traylor/Pryzbilla/Haslip...&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113036166815190739?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113036166815190739/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113036166815190739' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113036166815190739'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113036166815190739'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/10/bucks-acquire-jamaal-magloire.html' title='Bucks acquire Jamaal Magloire'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-113018854173986137</id><published>2005-10-24T14:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-24T14:15:41.753-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Quick Packers Take</title><content type='html'>Yesterday's game versus Minnesota may have been a new low. I didn't hear any statistic about it, but was this the largest lead lost during the Brett Favre era? I&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;understand why Sherman went on cruise control in the second half, but that still doesn't explain some of the things that happened. It was evident that Minnesota made some adjustments at halftime to fix the problems they were having. They rotated a safety over the top of Driver to take him out of the game and on offense, they opened it up for Culpepper to run more (based on the defense GB was showing). Did the coaching staff not see this in the booth? Did they think the 17 point lead was insurmountable, and that even if the Vikings did comeback it wouldn't be enough to win? Surely they remembered their game against Carolina a few weeks ago; the game isn't over until the final whistle.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While much of the blame goes on the coaching staff, you have to fault the players for poor execution. There was poor blocking in the running game all day, and the special teams were horrible (both kicking and covering). This team is on the edge of disaster, and with the easy part of their schedule completed, it's very possible they could be 1-9.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-113018854173986137?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/113018854173986137/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=113018854173986137' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113018854173986137'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/113018854173986137'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/10/quick-packers-take.html' title='Quick Packers Take'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-112915021943578462</id><published>2005-10-12T13:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-10-12T13:50:19.440-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Brewers End of Season Wrap</title><content type='html'>The Brewers recently concluded their first non-losing season since 1992 and optimism is high that they will finally have a winning record next year.  I think this is entirely possible, however there are some holes that need to be filled for this to become reality. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, they need more depth in their bullpen.  Turnbow was great, however getting to him this year proved difficult (it's one reason Doug Davis was stuck on 9 wins forever).  They need a guy like Scot Shields of Anaheim to come in and shut the other team down for an inning or two late in the game.  Matt Wise could possibly be that guy but he's pretty old.  Same with Kane Davis.  Jose Capellan has probably the best opportunity to fill that role, however I think they eventually want him to start.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Second, they need to improve defensively.  JJ Hardy is solid at shortstop and Bill Hall has improved dramatically, but Ricky Weeks needs some serious work.  Some of the errors he had were flat out horrible, and he needs to work in the offseason to improve here.  Overbay is average, and Prince won't be an upgrade defensively, so Weeks really needs to work to shore up the right side of the infield.  The outfielders are OK, however they lack the range that the top defenders have. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, they need to improve their timely hitting.  There were too many situations this year where they had runners in scoring position and didn't bring them home.  They need to focus on the little things in these situations that the winners do.  If there is a runner on second with no outs, you HAVE to get the bunt down, and if unsuccessful, you need to hit to the right side of the infield.  The runner has to get to third.  Speaking of runners on third, you shouldn't be trying to hit a ball 500 feet (unless your name is Carlos).  A sacrifice fly will suffice, and even a ground ball to short or second will get the run home.  Too many Brewers are either popping up or striking out when the runner is on third.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the Brewers improve these three areas, their record should improve next year.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-112915021943578462?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/112915021943578462/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=112915021943578462' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/112915021943578462'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/112915021943578462'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/10/brewers-end-of-season-wrap.html' title='Brewers End of Season Wrap'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-112474681421530907</id><published>2005-08-22T14:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2005-08-24T14:30:48.353-07:00</updated><title type='text'>What I see in the NFC this year</title><content type='html'>In the NFC East, Andy Reid will have Philadelphia ready this year, regardless of whether or not TO plays. He's very focused as a coach and has nearly the entire team on his side. Minus any more major injuries, expect them to win at least 10 games this year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the South, Carolina will have a better record than they had last year. They know what to expect at running back, they still have quality recievers, and their defense is loaded. Julius Peppers might be the best player in the NFL. I expect them to win this division.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Minnesota should win the NFC Central. They finally have some talent in their defensive backfield, and their defensive line is strong. Losing Moss will hurt a little, but Culpepper will be able to spread the ball around more. His production will fall, but expect their rushing statistics to be much better than they were last year, his included.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The NFC west is up for grabs. The trendy pick right now is that the Cardinals will win, however I'm still not convinced. Kurt Warner has taken a beating in his career and will fumble once someone breathes on him. I expect Seattle to win this division with 9 wins, and the Rams to win 8 games at the most. Each team does get the 49ers twice, but SF will win a few games and I expect them to steal a few at home.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the wild cards, I think Atlanta and Green Bay will round out the playoffs. Vick is still unstoppable, and while their schedule is tough, most of their difficult games are at home (New England, Philly, Minnesota, and Green Bay all play at Atlanta, and they'll be 2-2 at the worst in those 4 games) and they have winnable games on the road at Detroit, Chicago, and Miami. If they can go 5-3 in their division, that gives them 8 wins, with the potential to sneak a win or two to get to 10. Green Bay could be 4-1 at their bye week (at Detroit, Cleveland, TB, and NO at home, and at Carolina), but then hit a tough stretch with road games at Minnesota, Cincinnati, Atlanta, and Philly and home games with Pitt and Minnesota. They then get the Bears twice, and Detroit and Seattle at home, and at Baltimore. Even if they go 2-4 in their tough strecth, they can easily go 3-2 to close at 9-7 (by the way, the early lines GB's over/under win total at 8). I think with parity, 9 wins will get GB into the playoffs. Granted, their defense is horrible, but they still have one of the best offenses in the NFL, assuming (correctly) that Favre will be healthy. If he goes, it'll be a train wreck. There's my 6 playoff teams for the NFC.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Teams that could surprise-Detroit, although Harrington so far in his career is as good at QB as Jordan was as an outfielder. If Seattle slips, Arizona will win the division, however I like Seattle's schedule and don't expect them to be worse than 8-8. I don't really see any other teams that have playoff potential. In the east, Dallas has too many holes to fill, New York is still a year or two away (especially if Manning's injury is serious) and Washington is horrendous. In the south, I think Tampa Bay is a year away with their young talent and New Orleans will be New Orleans and win their last 3 games to finish 7-9 and allow Haslett to be coach for one more year. You've seen my central picks except for the bears, and they will compete with SF for the worst record. In the west, I think St. Louis's train has finally gotten to the station and is done. If you saw Tomlinson run through them yesterday, you saw that their secondary is slow. Their offense will be pretty good, but their coaching isn't good enough to make up for their diminishing talent, SF might have BCS potential in they were a college team, however they are probably thinking Holiday Bowl.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-112474681421530907?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/112474681421530907/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=112474681421530907' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/112474681421530907'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/112474681421530907'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/08/what-i-see-in-nfc-this-year.html' title='What I see in the NFC this year'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10175419.post-110702986073458222</id><published>2005-01-29T13:02:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2005-01-29T12:17:52.653-08:00</updated><title type='text'>Miscellaneous Thoughts</title><content type='html'>The complete overhaul of the Green Bay coaching staff will not make much of an impact...you can't make chicken soup out of chicken...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Until the Badgers can consistently win on the road, they will be a Sweet 16 team at best.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The loss of Danny Kolb will not hurt the Brewers nearly as much as it might seem. Mike Adams should be ready to take over the closer role. Furthermore, that position is overrated. It is much easier to turn a failed or "diminishing" starter into a good closer than it is to turn a bad closer into a good starter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Staying with the Brewers, barring injury, they will win over 70 games this year. Expect Sheets to get more run support and their rookies will contribute more than the veterans they had in those positions last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bucks should trade Michael Redd for a big man. Nene would be a good fit, or someone else in that mold. They should also look to draft big, as their drafts the past few years have been awful. (See-Marcus Haslip, Joel Pryzbilla, Robert Traylor, etc).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10175419-110702986073458222?l=wisconsinsports.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/feeds/110702986073458222/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10175419&amp;postID=110702986073458222' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/110702986073458222'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10175419/posts/default/110702986073458222'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://wisconsinsports.blogspot.com/2005/01/miscellaneous-thoughts.html' title='Miscellaneous Thoughts'/><author><name>Michael Karolewicz</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02818419825010821131</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>
